| |
Sickness
absence has long been a problem for British industry. Backpain which
has been a prevalent cause of absence is now giving way to stress
related illnesses. Musculoskeletal and stress related illness can
account for over 50% of sickness absence in many organizations.
A related problem is the increasing number of liability claims for
illness or injury at work, and increasing insurance premiums.
We
have an Occupational Health department, but we're still having problems
Occupational
Health is fundamentally about protecting the health of the workforce,
ensuring that workers are fit for the work they do, and that the
work environment enables them to work safely and productively. As
Occupational Health is readily available to all organizations, why
then does industry continue to suffer under the burden of excessive
sickness absence? Why do some organizations with Occupational Health
in place still suffer high levels of sickness absence and claims?
In many organizations HR Managers often feel frustrated feel when
employees who are off sick keep sending in incapacity certificates
from their doctor with no apparent end in sight, and little or no
substantial help being provided by Occupational Health. Given that
the practitioners within Occupational Health teams are doing their
job, where does the process break down?
A
more objective and proactive approach to OH
The answer can be a complex one, depending upon the organization,
the culture, the policies and procedures, and of course, the Occupational
Health provision and how it is managed. However, it could be said
that Occupational Health, in partnership with client organizations,
needs to focus attention on solving the day to day problems, rather
than providing Occupational Health in the traditional manner. This
should not change the underlying objective of Occupational Health,
but enable a more effective process to benefit both the organization
and it’s employees. This requires a much more objective and
proactive approach to Occupational Health. Producing solutions to
the problem of sickness absence, time off due to injury and a high
claim rate will not come without cost, however, a successful partnership
between Occupational Health and the organization will transform
Occupational Health from a negative to a positive on the balance
sheet.
How
then, can this be achieved?
A proactive Occupational Health service needs to be flexible in
it’s approach and tackle the problems identified by factual
data such as sickness absence and cause, time off due to injury,
and injury claims at a strategic level by working in close partnership
with all levels of the organization – Health & Safety,
Human Resources, managers and employees. This may involve active
health promotion, education, communication, lifestyle assessment,
implementation of new procedures etc.
Occupational Health also needs to proactively tackle sickness absence
at the tactical level, by implementing robust procedures to objectively
determine fitness for work. Occupational Health advisors and physicians
need to work closely with primary care, make more use of specialist
resources to assess and diagnose illness and injury with recommendations
for treatment, and manage treatment as part of a rehabilitation
programme to help employees return to work. Objective assessment
and treatment of problems such as musculoskeletal related injuries
(backpain, shoulder pain etc.) and stress related illness supported
by multi-disciplinary teams of physiotherapists, chiropractors,
osteopaths, counsellors, psychologists etc. can significantly reduce
sickness absence levels and duration.
A
proactive approach by Occupational Health needs to be met by Industry
with the development and implementation of good policies and procedures
from senior management to the shopfloor covering sickness absence,
permanent ill-health, stress, drugs & alcohol, health surveillance
etc. Occupational Health can input to the development of many of
these policies. As with most things, it’s not just what you
do, but how you do it, that will achieve success.
back to home
|
|
|
| |
 |
protect
the health of the workforce, ensure that workers are
fit for the work they do, and that the work environment
enables them to work safely and productively |
 |
|
|